<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for SxDSalon: A group blog on social interaction design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sxdsalon.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org</link>
	<description>A group blog on social interaction design for social media by practitioners</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Sep 2010 20:39:09 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Conversation curation by Mark Mayhew</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/06/07/conversation-curation/comment-page-1/#comment-1956</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Mayhew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jun 2010 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alevin.com/?p=2257#comment-1956</guid>
		<description>great post (or, the half of it that I understood was great ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great post (or, the half of it that I understood was great <img src='http://blog.sxdsalon.org/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SxD: Social Objects by Facebook found a way to Kill Google &#124; wordpost</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/04/15/sxd-social-objects/comment-page-1/#comment-1780</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook found a way to Kill Google &#124; wordpost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 07:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3554917.post-3728073059747588082#comment-1780</guid>
		<description>[...] has now allowed us to treat every web page as a social object that may take a subordinate role to interaction. They&#8217;ve found a way to provide semantic [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has now allowed us to treat every web page as a social object that may take a subordinate role to interaction. They&#8217;ve found a way to provide semantic [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social dynamics and agile social design by Domain Guidebook</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/03/09/social-dynamics-and-agile-social-design/comment-page-1/#comment-1699</link>
		<dc:creator>Domain Guidebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 10:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3554917.post-7393114544087931814#comment-1699</guid>
		<description>Fantastic post full of useful tips! My site is fairly new and I am having a difficult time getting my subscribers to leave comments. They are coming to the website but I have the  feeling that “nobody wants to be first”.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fantastic post full of useful tips! My site is fairly new and I am having a difficult time getting my subscribers to leave comments. They are coming to the website but I have the  feeling that “nobody wants to be first”.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Geosocial filter failure by Filter Failure &#8211; Idapted TechTeam</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/03/24/geosocial-filter-failure/comment-page-1/#comment-1693</link>
		<dc:creator>Filter Failure &#8211; Idapted TechTeam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 04:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3554917.post-5019494667471261820#comment-1693</guid>
		<description>[...] Failure  Mar 30th, 2010 by Noah.    Came over this blog article about the social interaction design thoughts a few days ago.  Highlights:   For in the context of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Failure  Mar 30th, 2010 by Noah.    Came over this blog article about the social interaction design thoughts a few days ago.  Highlights:   For in the context of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Identity, Privacy and Differences for Women Online by Laura Gates</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/03/08/identity-privacy-and-differences-for-women-online/comment-page-1/#comment-1330</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Gates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 23:37:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.emdezine.com/deziningInteractions/?p=445#comment-1330</guid>
		<description>Good comments Adrian, and I totally agree, the person I am on Facebook is not necessarily what I reveal on Linked In, what I write in my blog, although personal, may not reveal all that I care to. I am very conscious about what I am revealing to the digital public and who has access to my information, Thanks for pointing this difference out!
Laura</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comments Adrian, and I totally agree, the person I am on Facebook is not necessarily what I reveal on Linked In, what I write in my blog, although personal, may not reveal all that I care to. I am very conscious about what I am revealing to the digital public and who has access to my information, Thanks for pointing this difference out!<br />
Laura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From followers and game mechanics to more valuable social functionality by &#8220;Follow me, oh follow me&#8221;: Episode 9 w/Brian Oberkirch &#171; TummelVision</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/03/02/from-followers-and-game-mechanics-to-more-valuable-social-functionality/comment-page-1/#comment-1241</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Follow me, oh follow me&#8221;: Episode 9 w/Brian Oberkirch &#171; TummelVision</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 19:34:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3554917.post-4621479223576952984#comment-1241</guid>
		<description>[...] Adrian Chan on game mechanics and social functionality  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Adrian Chan on game mechanics and social functionality  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If twitter is micro-blogging, is Buzz micro-commentary? by JoelFoner.com &#187; 2010-02-16 We Are The Network: Google Buzz Hands-On Workshop</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/02/13/if-twitter-is-micro-blogging-is-buzz-micro-commentary/comment-page-1/#comment-540</link>
		<dc:creator>JoelFoner.com &#187; 2010-02-16 We Are The Network: Google Buzz Hands-On Workshop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 03:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3554917.post-4898677756232891757#comment-540</guid>
		<description>[...] If Twitter is Micro-Blogging, is Buzz Micro-Commentary? http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/02/13/if-twitter-is-micro-blogging-is-buzz-micro-commentary [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] If Twitter is Micro-Blogging, is Buzz Micro-Commentary? <a href="http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/02/13/if-twitter-is-micro-blogging-is-buzz-micro-commentary" rel="nofollow">http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/02/13/if-twitter-is-micro-blogging-is-buzz-micro-commentary</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using remote research to inform social interaction design (SxD) by UGG Boots</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/02/04/using-remote-research-to-inform-social-interaction-design-sxd/comment-page-1/#comment-535</link>
		<dc:creator>UGG Boots</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://brynnevans.com/blog/?p=1803#comment-535</guid>
		<description>This article was helpful in a paper I am writing for my thesis.

Thanks

Bernice Franklin

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uggworld.eu&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UGG Boots&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uggworld.eu/bags-c-22.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;UGG Purses&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.uggworld.eu/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Classic Tall Chestnut&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article was helpful in a paper I am writing for my thesis.</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
<p>Bernice Franklin</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uggworld.eu" rel="nofollow">UGG Boots</a><br />
<a href="http://www.uggworld.eu/bags-c-22.html" rel="nofollow">UGG Purses</a><br />
<a href="http://www.uggworld.eu/" rel="nofollow">Classic Tall Chestnut</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Technology Use and the Lifestage Fallacy by Sean Leo Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/01/12/social-technology-use-and-the-lifestage-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-303</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Leo Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alevin.com/?p=1936#comment-303</guid>
		<description>Oh yea... one more.  There are policy and regional factors too.  Take for a very recent example the use of SMS for fund raising (&quot;mobile marketing&quot;). 

Just read the company the Red Cross contracted for the Haiti campaign took their main lessons learned in Europe to the US, as they are more advanced in this area.  This is partly due to a public focus on creating GSM standard in Europe years ago, which allowed mobile phone companies to focus on the phone, and carriers on usage.  In the US we let the carriers debate the standard (CDMA, GSM, etc.) for years and took a hands off approach.  Now we have differing networks, and are slower as we have carrier gate keepers that control/feature cripple it here in the US as it needs to go through a review/brand cycle with the carrier, etc.  

That has nothing to do with age, that is Public Policy and Region.  

In this respect you could blame for USA phone companies and public policy, not life stage, for our regional disadvantage here.  Now, finally, this being quickly addressed in the Valley with the iPhone and Nexus (notice both are on GSM?).  But did see all the battles Apple (now Google) had with the phone companies.  That took years to work through.  There is a reason these phones are starting with USA carriers on GSM networks (AT&amp;T/T-Mobile).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yea&#8230; one more.  There are policy and regional factors too.  Take for a very recent example the use of SMS for fund raising (&#8221;mobile marketing&#8221;). </p>
<p>Just read the company the Red Cross contracted for the Haiti campaign took their main lessons learned in Europe to the US, as they are more advanced in this area.  This is partly due to a public focus on creating GSM standard in Europe years ago, which allowed mobile phone companies to focus on the phone, and carriers on usage.  In the US we let the carriers debate the standard (CDMA, GSM, etc.) for years and took a hands off approach.  Now we have differing networks, and are slower as we have carrier gate keepers that control/feature cripple it here in the US as it needs to go through a review/brand cycle with the carrier, etc.  </p>
<p>That has nothing to do with age, that is Public Policy and Region.  </p>
<p>In this respect you could blame for USA phone companies and public policy, not life stage, for our regional disadvantage here.  Now, finally, this being quickly addressed in the Valley with the iPhone and Nexus (notice both are on GSM?).  But did see all the battles Apple (now Google) had with the phone companies.  That took years to work through.  There is a reason these phones are starting with USA carriers on GSM networks (AT&amp;T/T-Mobile).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Social Technology Use and the Lifestage Fallacy by Sean Leo Ryan</title>
		<link>http://blog.sxdsalon.org/2010/01/12/social-technology-use-and-the-lifestage-fallacy/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Leo Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 15:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.alevin.com/?p=1936#comment-302</guid>
		<description>I agree and have always countered the &quot;mythology of age&quot; when it comes to information technology.  It may true at the extreme tails (say grandpas and grandsons).  But it really is all about developing an interest in technology, drive to learn, symbolic reasoning, and intellectual curiosity, which can stay with you throughout your life, but need to be nourished consciously and periodically.

In fact, I would argue that a 45 year old with those qualities knows more about &quot;new technologies&quot; than a teen on it all day.  

Moreover those teens without those qualities will have trouble later in life as the two are merging as critical professional skills.  

Increasingly, you have will need to have both business and tech skills in the corporate world (Gen X was the &quot;in between&quot; era).  Those who teens who don&#039;t develop these, probably will start leaning on the technology &quot;generational myth&quot; as the excuse.  Oh those kids!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree and have always countered the &#8220;mythology of age&#8221; when it comes to information technology.  It may true at the extreme tails (say grandpas and grandsons).  But it really is all about developing an interest in technology, drive to learn, symbolic reasoning, and intellectual curiosity, which can stay with you throughout your life, but need to be nourished consciously and periodically.</p>
<p>In fact, I would argue that a 45 year old with those qualities knows more about &#8220;new technologies&#8221; than a teen on it all day.  </p>
<p>Moreover those teens without those qualities will have trouble later in life as the two are merging as critical professional skills.  </p>
<p>Increasingly, you have will need to have both business and tech skills in the corporate world (Gen X was the &#8220;in between&#8221; era).  Those who teens who don&#8217;t develop these, probably will start leaning on the technology &#8220;generational myth&#8221; as the excuse.  Oh those kids!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

